• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRANSFUSION AND LABORATORY MEDICINE ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 591-595.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2026.04.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Preliminary Development and Validation of the Group Voluntary Blood Donation Cognition and Intention Scale

HUANG Yuankun1, HU Huiying2, ZHU Ming3, LI Tianshu1, WANG Yuan2, WANG Ya2, JIANG Yingjia2, CHEN Yongjun2   

  1. 1Changsha Blood Center, Changsha 410000;
    2Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu 610052;
    3Urban Vocational College of Sichuan, Chengdu 610100
  • Received:2026-07-07 Online:2026-08-20 Published:2026-08-26

Abstract: Objective To develop a scale assessing cognition and intention regarding group voluntary blood donation, and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods A theoretical framework was constructed based on group dynamics. Initial scale items were generated through literature review and semi-structured interviews, and then revised and optimized via a pilot test. A total of 1 052 participants were recruited from enterprises and institutions that had regularly organized group blood donation activities, and they completed the formal scale administration. Item analysis done using the total sample. Then, all participants were randomly assigned into two subsamples: Sample 1 (n1=526) for exploratory factor analysis, and Sample 2 (n2=526) for confirmatory factor analysis, as well as tests of convergent validity, discriminant validity and reliability. Results The final scale comprised 27 items loading onto six factors: social cohesion, task cohesion, self-monitoring, conformity, self-efficacy, and group blood donation intention. These six factors collectively explained 78.91% of the total variance, exhibiting good construct validity. The fit indices of the six-factor structure were as follows: χ2/df=3.65, CFI=0.911, TLI=0.899, RMSEA=0.071, SRMR=0.065. The scale also showed favorable convergent and discriminant validity. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient and the Cronbach's α coefficients for each of the six dimensions were all≥0.8, reflecting strong internal consistency reliability. Conclusion The Group Voluntary Blood Donation Cognition and Intention Scale exhibits satisfactory reliability and validity, and could be used to evaluate members' cognitive perceptions and donation intentions in the context of group blood donation.

Key words: Group voluntary blood donation, Group dynamics, Scale development, Validity, Reliability

CLC Number: