• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRANSFUSION AND LABORATORY MEDICINE ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 353-356.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2022.03.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

National Proficiency Testing for HLA Low-Resolution Molecular Typing:2017~2020 Procedure

ZHANG Li-qun, XIAO Yao, ZHOU Xiao-yang, et al   

  1. The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics,Beijing Institute of Geriatrics,Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission,P.R. China 100730
  • Received:2021-12-14 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-22

Abstract: Objective To improve HLA genotyping performance in clinical laboratory,the results of National Proficiency Testing(PT)for HLA-A/B/DRB1 low-resolution genotyping were collected and summarized from 2017 to 2020. Methods HLA genotyping results from 2017~2020 PT were analyzed and different kinds of errors were described and classified,and the possible reasons were also analyzed. Results The number of participant laboratories was increasing from 78 to 96 during 2017 and 2020. 12 096 HLA alleles were returned from the participants during the 4 years and total of 127 errors(1.05%)were found. These 127 errors were classified into two major types including 13 technical errors and 114 artificial errors. The proportion of laboratory which made mistakes was 2.56%(2/78)、4.88%(4/82)、8.75%(7/80) and 3.13%(3/96)in 2017,2018,2019 and 2020,respectively. Conclusion There were above 2.5% of laboratories with errors in HLA genotyping PT surveys past four years. More attentions should be greatly paid to clinical HLA genotyping test and the procedure of reporting.

Key words: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA), Low-resolution genotyping, Proficiency Testing (PT)

CLC Number: