• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 591-595.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2026.04.019

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

团体无偿献血认知意向量表的初步编制与信效度检验*

黄源昆1, 胡慧颖2, 朱明3, 李天舒1, 王媛2, 王娅2, 蒋莹佳2, 陈勇军2   

  1. 1长沙血液中心,长沙 410000;
    2中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 输血研究所,成都 610052;
    3四川城市职业学院,成都 610100
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-07 出版日期:2026-08-20 发布日期:2026-08-26
  • 通讯作者: 陈勇军,主要从事献血(浆)者健康安全、血液资源配置和利用,以及献血(浆)者招募及服务研究,(E-mail)563528422@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:黄源昆,主要从事临床输血技术及无偿献血相关研究,(E-mail)28502091@qq.com。并列第一作者:胡慧颖,主要从事献血(浆)者招募及服务研究,(E-mail)h2y_pumc@hotmail.com。
  • 基金资助:
    *本课题受中国输血协会威高科研基金(No.CSBT-WG-2024-02)资助

Preliminary Development and Validation of the Group Voluntary Blood Donation Cognition and Intention Scale

HUANG Yuankun1, HU Huiying2, ZHU Ming3, LI Tianshu1, WANG Yuan2, WANG Ya2, JIANG Yingjia2, CHEN Yongjun2   

  1. 1Changsha Blood Center, Changsha 410000;
    2Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu 610052;
    3Urban Vocational College of Sichuan, Chengdu 610100
  • Received:2026-07-07 Online:2026-08-20 Published:2026-08-26

摘要: 目的 编制团体无偿献血认知意向量表,并检验其效度和信度。方法 基于群体动力学进行理论建构,结合文献回顾和半结构化访谈确定量表初始条目,通过预试验进行量表优化。在曾多次组织团体献血的企事业单位中选取1 052名参与者,进行正式施测。使用总样本进行条目分析,随后将参与者随机分为样本1(n1=526)用于探索性因子分析,样本2(n2=526)用于验证性因子分析、收敛效度分析、区分效度分析和信度分析。结果 形成量表共27个条目,分为“社交凝聚力”“任务凝聚力”“自我监控”“从众”“自我效能”和“团体献血意向” 6个因子,总方差贡献率为78.91%。量表结构效度较好,6因子结构拟合指标χ2/df=3.65,CFI=0.911,TLI=0.899,RMSEA=0.071,SRMR=0.065;量表收敛效度和区分效度良好。量表的总Cronbach's α及下属6个因子Cronbach's α的系数均≥0.8,量表信度良好。结论 团体无偿献血认知意向量表具有良好效度和信度,可用于评估团体献血情景中成员的认知和献血意向情况。

关键词: 团体无偿献血, 群体动力学, 量表编制, 效度, 信度

Abstract: Objective To develop a scale assessing cognition and intention regarding group voluntary blood donation, and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods A theoretical framework was constructed based on group dynamics. Initial scale items were generated through literature review and semi-structured interviews, and then revised and optimized via a pilot test. A total of 1 052 participants were recruited from enterprises and institutions that had regularly organized group blood donation activities, and they completed the formal scale administration. Item analysis done using the total sample. Then, all participants were randomly assigned into two subsamples: Sample 1 (n1=526) for exploratory factor analysis, and Sample 2 (n2=526) for confirmatory factor analysis, as well as tests of convergent validity, discriminant validity and reliability. Results The final scale comprised 27 items loading onto six factors: social cohesion, task cohesion, self-monitoring, conformity, self-efficacy, and group blood donation intention. These six factors collectively explained 78.91% of the total variance, exhibiting good construct validity. The fit indices of the six-factor structure were as follows: χ2/df=3.65, CFI=0.911, TLI=0.899, RMSEA=0.071, SRMR=0.065. The scale also showed favorable convergent and discriminant validity. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient and the Cronbach's α coefficients for each of the six dimensions were all≥0.8, reflecting strong internal consistency reliability. Conclusion The Group Voluntary Blood Donation Cognition and Intention Scale exhibits satisfactory reliability and validity, and could be used to evaluate members' cognitive perceptions and donation intentions in the context of group blood donation.

Key words: Group voluntary blood donation, Group dynamics, Scale development, Validity, Reliability

中图分类号: