• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRANSFUSION AND LABORATORY MEDICINE ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 75-84.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2026.01.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Longitudinal Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Kit Performance in Unvaccinated Individuals Infected with Omicron Variant Strains

LIU Qian1, SHANA Halemubieke2,3,4, ABUDULIMUTAILIPU Nuermaimaiti2,3,4, LIU Xinru2,3,4, CHANG Le2,3,4, JI Huimin2,3, SUN Huizhen2,3, YAN Ying2,3, WANG Lunan2,3,4   

  1. 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730;
    2National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, 100730;
    3Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing, 100730;
    4National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730
  • Received:2025-07-03 Published:2026-02-13

Abstract: Objective This study aimed to evaluate the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection kits based on the wild-type strain and Omicron variants in people living with HIV (PLWH) who were unvaccinated and infected with the Omicron variant. Methods This study recruited 45 unvaccinated PLWH who were infected with the Omicron BA.5 variant for the first time and conducted a follow up four months later. Antibody levels were measured using eight kits targeting the wild-type strain and two kits specific to Omicron variants. Pseudovirus neutralization assays targeting the wild-type (WT), BA.4/5, and XBB.1.5 variants were used as the gold standard. Agreement of qualitative results was assessed using McNemar and Kappa tests, while quantitative correlations were analyzed using Spearman correlation analysis. Results The wild-type antibody kits showed the highest agreement with WT-neutralizing antibody (nAb) (maximum κ=0.483), but significantly lower agreement with Omicron-nAb. Quantitatively, strong correlations were observed between wild-type kits and WT-nAb (rs=0.69~0.85), while correlations with BA.4/5 (rs=0.40~0.57) and XBB.1.5 (rs=0.43~0.63) -nAb were weaker. After second infection, the correlation between wild-type kits and Omicron-nAb was improved. Omicron-specific antibody kits demonstrated narrower 95% limits of agreement with Omicron-nAb neutralization assays. Conclusion In unvaccinated PLWH, antibody detection kits based on the wild-type strain showed limited effectiveness in assessing immune responses after Omicron infection. These findings support the development and application of variant-specific antibody kits for more accurate immune monitoring and evaluation.

Key words: SARS-CoV-2, Antibody kits, Omicron strains, Unvaccinated people living with HIV, Pseudovirus neutralization assay

CLC Number: