• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 488-492.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2021.04.017

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

喹诺酮类、β-内酰胺类联合喹诺酮类及碳氢霉烯类药物经验性治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效比较*

郭琳红, 张明国, 高歌, 郑其彬, 时尚, 张少文, 周树生   

  1. 236000 阜阳市肿瘤医院重症医学科(郭琳红,张明国,高歌,郑其彬,时尚,张少文); 中国科技大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)急诊医学科(周树生)
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-19 发布日期:2021-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 周树生,男,主任医师,硕士生导师,主要从事危重病诊治和抗生素合理使用的研究,(E-mail)zhouss108@163.com。
  • 作者简介:郭琳红(1969-),男,本科,主治医师,主要从事危重症的诊断和治疗,(E-mail)563335217@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    *本课题受安徽省自然科学基金项目(No.1608085MH214)资助

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Quinolones, β- lactams Combined with Quinolones and Carbapenems in the Empirical Treatment of Severe Community Acquired Pneumonia

GUO Lin-hong, ZHANG Ming-guo, GAO Ge, et al   

  1. Fuyang Cancer Hospital 236000
  • Received:2021-04-19 Published:2021-08-18

摘要: 目的 探讨单用喹诺酮类药物、喹诺酮类联合β-内酰胺类药物,以及单用碳氢霉烯类药物在治疗重症社区获得性肺炎患者中的疗效。方法 选取2016年6月~2020年10月本院收治的105例重症医学科诊断为重症社区获得性肺炎的住院患者。根据抗生素使用情况将其分为三组,第一组为单独使用喹诺酮类药物莫西沙星,第二组为联合使用β-内酰胺类抗生素头孢曲松和喹诺酮类药物莫西沙星,第三组为单独使用碳青霉烯类抗生素亚胺培南。比较三组治疗总有效率、抗菌药物使用时间、临床症状(咳嗽咳痰、发热及肺部啰音)改善时间、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间,以及炎症指标WBC、CRP、PCT水平变化等情况。结果 105例患者中,在总有效率方面,第一组和第二组相比差异无统计学意义(χ2=8.274,P=0.116);第一组和第三组相比,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.679,P=0.005);第二组和第三组相比,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.311,P=0.856)。在临床指标方面,三组均有改善,第一组与第二组相比较,均存在统计学差异(P<0.05);第一组和第三组相比较,除ICU住院时间外,均存在统计学差异(P<0.05);第二组与第三组相比较,仅ICU住院时间存在统计学差异(P<0.05);三组患者治疗后的相关炎症因子水平均有降低(P<0.05),第一、二组相比较,WBC及PCT降低水平存在统计学差异(P<0.05);第一组与第三组相比较,WBC及CRP降低水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);第二组与第三组相比较,仅PCT降低水平存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论 在重症社区获得性肺炎的治疗中,相比单用莫西沙星,莫西沙星联合头孢曲松以及单用亚胺培南的治疗效果更佳。

关键词: 莫西沙星, 头孢曲松, 亚胺培南, 重症社区获得性肺炎, 炎症因子

Abstract: Objective To explore the efficacy of quinolones alone, combined with β-lactam ceftriaxone and carbapenems alone in the treatment of patients with severe community acquired pneumonia. Methods A total of 105 severe community-acquired pneumonia cases in the department of intensive care medicine from June 2016 to August 2020 were enrolled in our hospital. They were divided into three groups according to their use of antibiotics. The first group were treated with moxifloxacin (quinolone drug), the second group patients were treated with ceftriaxone combined with moxifloxacin (β-lactam antibiotic combined with quinolone), and the third group patients were treated with imipenem (carbapenem antibiotic) as a single agent. We compared the total effective rate of the three groups of treatment, the use time of antibacterial drugs, the improvement time of clinical symptoms (cough, sputum, fever and pulmonary rale), mechanical ventilation time, the length of stay in ICU, and the changes in the levels of inflammation indicators (WBC, CRP and PCT). Results Among 105 patients, there was no significant difference in total effective rate between the first group and the second group(χ2=8.274,P= 0.116) and between the second group and the third group (χ2=0.311,P=0.856), but statistically significant difference between the first group and the third group (χ2=10.679,P=0.005). In terms of clinical indicators, patients of three groups were all improved. There was statistically significant difference in all clinical indicators between the first group and the second group(P<0.05); Except for the length of stay in the ICU, the difference was statistically significant in other indicators between the first group and the third group(P<0.05), and only the length of stay in ICU was statistically different between the second group the third group(P<0.05). The inflammatory factors of the three groups were reduced after treatment(P<0.05). The reduction of blood WBC and PCT level showed statistically difference between the first group and the second group(P<0.05); The reduction of the blood WBC and CRP in the first group compared with the third group; Only the reduction of blood PCT level were statistically significant in the second group compared with the third group (P<0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia, compared with moxifloxacin alone, moxifloxacin combined with ceftriaxone, and imipenem alone have better effect.

Key words: Moxifloxacin, Ceftriaxone, Imipenem, Community acquired pneumonia, Inflammatory factors

中图分类号: