• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 523-527.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2023.04.018

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

56~60周岁男性多次单采血小板献血者血常规及凝血功能评价

王伟, 程晨, 张美婷, 许珍珍, 韩芳芳, 骆群   

  1. 解放军总医院第五医学中心,北京 100071
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-15 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-09-18
  • 通讯作者: 骆群,主任医师,博士,主要从事临床输血方面研究,(E-mail)123498896@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:王伟,主要从事血液采集与单采治疗方面研究,(E-mail)757293748@qq.com。

Evaluation of Blood Routine and Coagulation Function in Male Multiple Platelet Donors Aged 56 to 60

WANG Wei, CHENG Chen, ZHANG Meiting, et al   

  1. The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital 100071
  • Received:2023-05-15 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-09-18

摘要: 目的 探讨56~60周岁男性多次单采血小板献血者定期捐献单采血小板对其血常规及凝血功能的影响,以便更好的指导高龄献血工作的进行。方法 选取本中心2021年11月—2022年8月健康男性献血者共61例,其中单采血小板献血者51例、未捐献过单采血小板的健康全血献血者10例。单采血小板献血者均为多次单采者(近一年内捐献单采血小板>10次),多次单采者中56周岁~60周岁献血者有12例为A组,18~55周岁献血者有39例为B组;未捐献过单采血小板的健康全血献血者年龄均为56~60周岁,共10例为C组。在单采血小板采集前留取样本,检测其血常规、血栓弹力图(TEG)、凝血酶时间(TT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)及纤维蛋白原(Fg)。应用SPSS26.0统计分析软件进行One-way ANOVA分析比较其差异性。结果 A、B、C三组比较,Hb、Hct、PLT、MPV、PCT存在一定的差异性(P<0.05),而其他血常规指标则无明显差异性(P>0.05);A组与B组比较,红细胞、白细胞、血小板相关血常规指标均无明显差异(P>0.05);A组与C组比较,Hb、Hct显著降低,而PLT、PCT则是出现升高,两指标对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其他血常规指标则无明显差异(P>0.05)。三组TEG(血栓弹力图)的R值、K值、Angle值、MA值均在正常参考范围内,且A、B、C三组之间以及A组与B组、C组比较TEG各项指标均无明显差异(P>0.05)。三组中A组与B组TT、PT、APTT均在正常参考值范围内,而Fg均出现轻微升高,C组则是TT值出现一定程度升高而其他三个指标正常;A、B、C三组间比较,TT、PT存在明显差异(P<0.05),而APTT、Fg则无明显差异;A组与B组比较,凝血相关各项指标均无明显差异(P>0.05);A组TT、PT均低于C组,且两组对比差异明显(P<0.05),而APTT、Fg则无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 56~60周岁男性单采血小板献血者定期捐献单采血小板对其血常规及凝血功能并无明显影响,但同时也应在采集过程中加强对单采者健康的监测。

关键词: 56~60周岁, 男性多次单采者, 血常规, 凝血功能, 血栓弹力图(TEG)

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of regularly donating platelets from male multiple platelet donors aged 56 to 60 on their blood routine and coagulation function for a better guide to the elderly blood donation. Methods A total of 61 healthy male blood donors were selected from our center from November 2021 to August 2022, including 51 single platelet donors and 10 healthy whole blood donors who had not donated single platelet. The single platelet donors were all multiple donors (>10 times in the past year), among whom 12 donors aged 56 to 60 were assigned in Group A, and 39 donors aged 18 to 55 in Group B; healthy whole blood donors wihtout donation of single collected platelets were all aged 56 to 60 years old, with a total of 10 cases in Group C. Before collecting platelets, samples were taken and their blood routine, thromboelastogram (TEG), thrombin time (TT), Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and fibrinogen (Fg) were tested. SPSS26.0 statistical analysis software was used for one way ANOVA analysis to compare its differences. Results Some differences were observed in Hb, Hct, PLT, MPV, and PCT (P<0.05), but not in other blood routine indicators (P>0.05) between groups A, B and C. There was no significant difference in blood routine indicators related to red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets between Group A and Group B (P>0.05); compared with Group C, Hb, Hct in Group A showed a significant decrease, while PLT and PCT were increased. The difference between the two indicators was statistically significant (P<0.05), while other blood routine indicators did not differ (P>0.05). The R, K, Angle, and MA values of TEG (thromboelastography) in the three groups were within the normal reference range, with no significant difference in TEG indicators among Groups A, B, C, between Group A and Group B, or between Group A and Group C (P>0.05). TT, PT, and APTT in Group A and Group B were all within the normal reference range, but FIB showed a slight increase, and TT in Group C had a certain degree of increase while the other three indicators were normal; a significant difference was noted in TT and PT between groups A, B and C (P<0.05), but not in APTT and Fg.There was no significant difference in coagulation related indicators between Group A and Group B (P>0.05); TT and PT in Group A were lower than those in Group C, with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05); however, APTT and FIB showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion Regular donation of single platelet donors aged 56 to 60 does not have a pronounced impact on their blood routine and coagulation function. Considering paucity of single platelet resources, we should encourage multiple single platelet donors aged 56 to 60 to regularly donate single platelet. Meanwhile, however, it is also necessary to monitor the health of single collectors during the collection process.

Key words: 56 to 60 years old, Male multiple platelet donors, Blood routine, Coagulation function, Thromboelastogram, (TEG)

中图分类号: