• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 215-221.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2026.02.010

• 临床输血 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于深度学习的低氧存储红细胞形态智能分析技术研究

权成子1, 付蓉2, 张雷3, 李宜圃1, 贺敏威1, 孙苏静1, 詹林盛1   

  1. 1军事科学院军事医学研究院卫生勤务与血液研究所,北京 100850;
    2陆军第九五六医院输血科,西藏林芝 860000;
    3西藏军区总医院输血科,西藏拉萨 850007
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-22 接受日期:2025-12-23 出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 詹林盛,主要从事免疫学相关研究,(E-mail)amms91@126.com。共同通信作者:孙苏静,主要从事高原输血救治相关研究,(E-mail)ammsreb@163.com。
  • 作者简介:权成子,主要从事红细胞储存损伤机制分析及防治研究,(E-mail)quansz0111@163.com。并列第一作者:付蓉,主要从事高原输血医学研究,(E-mail)657246836@qq.com。

Intelligent Analysis Technology for Morphology of Red Blood Cells Stored Under Hypoxia Based on Deep Learning

QUAN Chengzi1, FU Rong2, ZHANG Lei3, LI Yipu1, HE Minwei1, SUN Sujing1, ZHAN Linsheng1   

  1. 1Institute of Health Service and Transfusion Medicine, Beijing 100850;
    2Blood Transfusion Department of 956th Hospital of PLA, Linzhi 850007;
    3Blood Transfusion Department of the General Hospital of PLA Xizang Military Area Command, Lhasa 850007
  • Received:2025-09-22 Accepted:2025-12-23 Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-04-22

摘要: 目的 高原地区低氧环境对红细胞储存质量产生显著影响,传统评估手段难以实现快速、精准、动态的质量监测。本研究构建基于深度学习图像识别技术的红细胞储存损伤评估模型,系统比较不同储存条件(常氧vs.低氧)下红细胞的形态演变特征,探索其在高原输血保障中的应用价值。方法 分别收集常氧(21% O2)与低氧(8% O2)条件下的储存红细胞样品及平原(北京,≈500 m)与高原(拉萨,≈3 600 m)储存红细胞样本,每周采集红细胞图像,构建时间序列数据集。基于YOLOV5s算法建立红细胞九分类形态识别模型,引入形态学指数(MI)与光滑盘状细胞百分比(SDC%)作为质量评估指标,比较不同储存条件与地域来源的红细胞损伤进程。结果 常氧储存红细胞自第3周起MI显著下降,第5周MI下降21.08%,SDC%下降31.33%;低氧储存组MI仅下降13.40%,SDC%下降20%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。高原红细胞在储存第2周及以后形态退化显著慢于平原红细胞,第5周高原组MI为83.96%,显著高于平原组76.61%,提示高原低氧环境有助于维持储存红细胞形态。结论 本研究实现了基于深度学习的高原红细胞储存损伤动态评估,构建的MI与SDC%指标可量化高原红细胞形态退化,具备高通量、非侵入、可迁移等优势。该模型为高原血液质量快速检定提供了智能化技术支撑。

关键词: 高原红细胞, 储存损伤, 深度学习, 形态学指数, 低氧储存

Abstract: Objective The hypoxic environment of plateau regions significantly affects the quality of stored red blood cells (RBCs), and conventional assessment methods are inadequate for rapid, accurate, and dynamic quality monitoring. This study developed a deep learning-based image recognition model for evaluating red blood cells (RBCs) storage leisions, systematically compared the morphological evolution of RBCs under different storage conditions (normoxia versus hypoxia), and explored its potential application in transfusion support at high altitude. Methods RBC units stored under normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (8% O2) conditions were collected together with units obtained from Beijing (≈500 m) and Lhasa (≈3 600 m). RBC images were acquired every week to construct a time-series dataset. A nine-class RBC morphological recognition model was established based on the YOLOV5s algorithm and the morphological index (MI) and smooth disc cell percentage (SDC%) were introduced as quality assessment parameters to compare the progression of storage leisions in RBCs under different storage conditions and from different geographic origins. Results In the normoxic storage group, MI began to decline significantly from week 3 onward; by week 5, MI had decreased by 21.08% and SDC% by 31.33%. In contrast, the hypoxic storage group showed declines of only 13.40% in MI and 20% in SDC%, with statistically significant differences between groups (P<0.01). RBCs stored at high altitude exhibited significantly slower morphological deterioration than those stored in the plains from week 2 onward. At week 5, MI in the plateau group was 83.96%, significantly higher than 76.61% in the plains group, suggesting that the hypoxic environment at high altitude helps preserve stored RBC morphology. Conclusion This study achieved a dynamic, deep learning-based assessment of storage lesions in plateau RBCs. The proposed MI and SDC% metrics enable quantitative evaluation of RBC morphological deterioration at high altitude and offer advantages including high throughput, noninvasiveness, and transferability. This model provides intelligent technical support for rapid quality testing of blood products in plateau regions.

Key words: High-altitude red blood cells, Storage lesion, Deep learning, Morphological index, Hypoxic storage

中图分类号: