• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (4): 516-520.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2024.04.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

ABO血型不相合血小板输注的临床效果与安全性研究

庄金木, 周世乔   

  1. 南方医科大学深圳医院输血科,广东深圳 518000
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-01 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-09-23
  • 通讯作者: 周世乔,主要从事输血全过程管理研究,(E-mail)shiqiaozhou@163.com。
  • 作者简介:庄金木,主要从事临床输血方向研究,(E-mail)zjm002526@163.com。

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of ABO Incompatible Platelet Transfusion

ZHUANG Jinmu, ZHOU Shiqiao   

  1. Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000
  • Received:2024-07-01 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-09-23

摘要: 目的 研究紧急情况下ABO血型不相合血小板输注的临床效果和安全性。方法 收集2020年1月—2024年1月我院ABO血型不相合血小板输注271例,符合纳入标准128人。设不相合输注为ABO血型不相合实验组(B亚组),之前ABO同型血小板输注设为ABO同型对照组(A亚组),之后ABO同型血小板输注设为ABO同型实验组(C亚组)。血小板输注后血小板变化值(△PLT)和24 h血小板纠正增加指数(CCI)评估血小板输注临床效果,以是否发生溶血性输血反应评估血小板输注安全性。结果 主次侧不相合组中A亚组、B亚组、C亚组之间△PLT和CCI无明显差异(P>0.05);主侧不相合组中,B亚组△PLT和CCI明显低于A亚组和C亚组(P<0.05),但A亚组和C亚组之间无明显差异(P>0.05);次侧不相合组中,A亚组、B亚组、C亚组之间△PLT和CCI无明显差异(P>0.05)。ABO血型不相合输注均未出现急性溶血性输血反应。结论 ABO主侧不相合血小板输注的临床效果明显低于ABO同型血小板输注,但不影响后续ABO同型血小板输注效果。ABO次侧不相合血小板输注的临床效果与ABO同型血小板的临床效果相当,但有可能影响后续ABO同型血小板输注效果。ABO血型不相合血小板输注均未发生明显溶血性输血反应。

关键词: ABO血型不相合, 血小板输注, 临床效果, 安全性

Abstract: Objectives To study the clinical efficacy and safety of ABO incompatible platelet transfusion in emergency situations. Methods 271 cases of ABO incompatible platelet transfusion in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2024 were collected, and 128 cases were enrolled which were divided into bidirectional mismatch group (10 cases), major mismatch group (56 cases), and minor mismatch group (62 cases). All 128 patients had ABO homologous platelet transfusion history before and within 10 days after ABO incompatible platelet transfusion. The incompatible transfusion was set as the ABO blood group incompatible experimental group (subgroup B), the previous ABO homozygous platelet transfusion was set as the ABO homozygous control group (subgroup A), and the subsequent ABO homozygous platelet transfusion was set as the ABO homozygous experimental group (subgroup C). Platelet count change after platelet transfusion (△PLT) and 24 h platelet corrected count Increment (CCI) were used to evaluate the clinical effect of platelet transfusion, and the safety of platelet transfusion was assessed by the presence or absence of hemolytic transfusion reactions. Results In the bidirectional mismatch group, there was no significant difference in △PLT and CCI among subgroups A, B and C (P>0.05). In the major mismatch group, the △PLT and CCI of subgroup B were significantly lower than those of subgroups A and C (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between subgroup A and C (P>0.05). In the minor mismatch group, there was no significant difference in △PLT and CCI among subgroups A, B and C (P>0.05). There was no acute hemolytic transfusion reactions in any of the ABO incompatibility infusion. Conclusion The clinical effect of ABO major mismatch platelet transfusion is obviously weaker than that of ABO compatible platelet transfusion, but did not affect the outcome of subsequent ABO homozygous platelet transfusion. The clinical effect of ABO minor mismatch platelet transfusion is similar to that of ABO compatible platelet transfusion, but could potentially affect the outcome of subsequent ABO homozygous platelet transfusions. No significant hemolytic transfusion reaction was found by ABO incompatible platelet transfusion.

Key words: ABO incompatible, Platelet transfusion, Clinical efficacy, Safety

中图分类号: