M蛋白在重氮法与钒酸氧化法检测胆红素中的影响初探

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2018.02.020

临床输血与检验 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 174-177.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2018.02.020

M蛋白在重氮法与钒酸氧化法检测胆红素中的影响初探

徐云云, 胡安群

246003 安徽医科大学附属安庆医院

收稿日期:2017-11-22 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2018-04-25
通讯作者: 胡安群（1967-）,男,主任技师,硕士,（E-mail）haq0828@hotmail.com。
作者简介:徐云云（1990-）女,安徽安庆人,检验师,学士,主要从事临床检验诊断工作,（E-mail）sunshinexyy@hotmail.com。

To Learn the Influence of the Detemination of Bilirubin by Means of Diazo and Vanadate Oxidation in the Patient with Paraprotein

XU Yun-yun, HU An-qun

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Anqing City Affiliatted Hospital of Anhui Medical University 246003

Received:2017-11-22 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过对M蛋白阳性病例用重氮法、钒酸氧化法、干化学法测定胆红素浓度,探讨M蛋白在重氮法与钒酸氧化法胆红素测定中的影响。方法收集安庆市立医院2015年8月~2017年6月247例M蛋白阳性患者血清,分为多发性骨髓瘤（MM）组与非MM组,收集M蛋白阴性患者血清为对照组。三组均采用干化学法、重氮法、钒酸氧化法测定胆红素。以干化学检测结果为标准,对各组重氮法和钒酸氧化法胆红素的检测结果进行比较。结果 MM组和非MM组的组内重氮法和钒酸氧化法总胆红素检测结果的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05),而对照组的组内重氮法和钒酸氧化法总胆红素检测结果的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。MM组与对照组的重氮法与干化学法总胆红素检测结果的差值比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）;非MM组与对照组重氮法与干化学法总胆红素检测结果的差值比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）;MM组与非MM组重氮法与干化学法胆红素检测结果的差值比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）。MM组与对照组钒酸氧化法与干化学法总胆红素检测结果的差值比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）;非MM组与对照组钒酸氧化法与干化学法总胆红素检测结果的差值比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）;MM组与非MM组钒酸氧化法与干化学法总胆红素检测结果的差值比较无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 M蛋白影响重氮法和钒酸氧化法总胆红素测定,MM患者与非MM患者的M蛋白对重氮法胆红素测定的影响程度不同。

关键词: M蛋白, 胆红素, 重氮法, 钒酸氧化法, 干化学法, 影响

Abstract: Objective To learn the effect of paraprotein in bilirubin measured by diazo method, vanadate oxidation and dry chemistry through bilirubin concentration basing on in the patients with paraprotein. Methods The serum of 247 cases of patients with paraprotein positive from Anqing Municipal Hospital from August 2015 to June 2017 was collected and divided into treatment groups: multiple myeloma (MM) group and non MM group. The serum of 50 case of patients with negative paraprotein was collected as the control group.Each sample was analyzed by dry chemical method, diazonium method, and vanadate oxidation method.. Analyse the test results of the determination of bilirubin in ways of diazo and vanadate compared with dry chemical. Results The difference of the bilirubin concentration by the means of diazonium and vanadate oxidation were statistically significant in the group of MM and non MM,while the difference were not statistically significant in the control group.The D-value of diazo method and dry chemistry were statistically significant in the MM group and control group, as in the groups of MM and non MM,meanwhile they were statistically significant in the non MM group and control group.The D-value of vanadate oxidation and dry chemistry were statistically significant in the MM group and control group, as non MM group and control group ,while they were not statistically significant in the groups of MM and non MM. Conclusion The total bilirubin concentration was affected by diazotization and vanadate oxidation in patients with paraprotein,while paraprotein in patients with MM and non MM patients has different effects on the determination of bilirubin by diazo method.

Key words: Paraprotein, Bilirubin, Diazonium method, Vanadate oxidotion method, Dry chemical method, Influence

中图分类号:

R446.11

徐云云, 胡安群. M蛋白在重氮法与钒酸氧化法检测胆红素中的影响初探[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2018, 20(2): 174-177.

XU Yun-yun, HU An-qun. To Learn the Influence of the Detemination of Bilirubin by Means of Diazo and Vanadate Oxidation in the Patient with Paraprotein[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRANSFUSION AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 20(2): 174-177.

参考文献

1 Amin S B. Clinnical assessment of bilirubin induced neurotoxicity in premature infants[J].Semin Perinatol，2004，28（5）：340-347.
2 Ostrow J D，Pascolo L，Shapiro S M. New concepts in bilirubin encephalopathy [J].Eur J Clin Invest，2003，33（11）：988-997.
3 Vitek L，Carey M C.Enterohepatic cycling of bilirubin as a cause of black pigment gallstones in adult life [J].Eur J Clin Invest，2003，33（9）：799-810.
4 侯建.M蛋白的鉴定及结果分析[J].中华血液学杂志，2002，23（10）：559-560.
5 Yang Y S.Paraproteins Are a Common Cause of Interferences With Automated Chemistry Methods[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med，2008，132（2）：217-223.
6 Datta P，Graham G A，Schoen I. Interference by IgG paraproteins in the Jaffe method for creatinine determination[J]. Am J Clin Pathol，1986，85（4）：463-468.
7 Smith J D，Nobiletti J，Freed M，et al. Interference with the Astra 8 and Synchron CX3 assays of urea nitrogen in serum by a high-M r inhibitor in a patient with multiple myeloma[J]. Clin Chem，1992，38（4）：598-599.
8 McCloskey E V，Galloway J，Morgan M A，et al. Pseudohyperphosphataemia in multiple myeloma[J]. BMJ，1989，299（6712）：1381–1382.
9 John R，Oleesky D，Issa B，et al. Pseudohypercalcaemia in two patients with IgM paraproteinaemia[J]. Ann Clin Biochem，1997，34（11）：694–696.
10 Bakker A J. Influence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in direct determinations of iron in serum[J]. Clin Chem，1991，37（5）：690–694.
11 Yamada K，Yagihashi A，Ishii S，et al. Interference with nephelometric assay of C-reactive protein and antistreptolysin-O by monoclonal IgM- κ from a myeloma patient[J]. Clin Chem，1997，43（12）：2435–2437.
12 Nauti A，Barassi A，Merlini G，et al. Paraprotein interference in an assay of conjugated bilirubin[J]. Clin Chem，2005，51（6）：1076–1077.
13 葛均波，徐永健.内科学[M].第8版.北京.人民卫生出版社，2014：604.
14 Smogorzewska A，Flood J G，Long W H，et al. Paraprotein interference in automated chemistry analyzers[J]. Clin Chem，2004，50（9）：1691–1693.
15 Yang Y，Howanitz P J，Howanitz J H，et al.Paraproteina are a common cause of interferences with automated chemistry methods[J]. Aech PatholLab Med，2008，132（2）：217-223.
16 Zaman Z，Sneyers L，Van Orshoven A，et al. Elimination of paraprotein interference in determination of plasma inorganic phosphate by ammonium molybdate method[J]. Clin Chem，1995，41（4）：609–614.
17 K ing R I，F Lorkowski C M. How paraproteins can affect laboratory assays：spurious results and biological effects[J].Pathology，2010，42（5）：397–401.
18 江树仙，郭洪奎.钒酸盐法检测总胆红素（TBl L）干扰1例[J].医学前沿，2016，6（13）：105-106.

[1]	刘倩, 王笑欢, 郭凯, 牛子健, 宋珊珊, 郭婧, 马曙轩. 新生儿换血前后实验室指标的变化趋势^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 177-180.
[2]	甘珊, 段灵, 胡红兵. 新生儿高胆红素血症换血治疗用血情况分析^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 185-188.
[3]	沈薇薇, 李宗锋, 卜秋宁, 金亮, 陈宏伟, 杨丹丹, 王术艺. 狼疮性肾炎患者血清胆红素水平的变化及意义^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2020, 22(5): 533-537.
[4]	吕晓华. 异常蛋白凝集干扰交叉配血提示确诊1例多发性骨髓瘤[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2020, 22(4): 443-445.
[5]	聂丽容, 李庆华, 梁亮, 何红华, 马境志. 硼替佐米联合化疗对多发性骨髓瘤的治疗效果及对VEGF、IL-6、IL-17的影响[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2020, 22(2): 211-214.
[6]	杨扬, 孙家苓. 850例全血捐献者血管迷走神经反应观察[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2019, 21(5): 496-498.
[7]	陈锦艳, 林绮文, 欧阳剑, 许颖莹, 黎世杰, 何博, 梁华钦. 机采血小板献血者外周血血小板计数水平影响因素的纵向研究^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2019, 21(4): 375-379.
[8]	邓莉, 杨冬燕, 周琼. 不同离心时间对去白悬浮红细胞质量的影响^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2019, 21(4): 395-397.
[9]	黎世杰, 陈锦艳, 谢桂芸, 梁燕梅, 冯凡凡, 邓学成, 邓阳凡, 蓝琴, 汪传喜. 初次全血献血者再次献血影响因素研究^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2019, 21(4): 408-412.
[10]	李元红, 徐宗风, 王松, 林茹, 高长杰. 某市二级及以上医疗机构输血安全影响因素分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2019, 21(3): 323-324.
[11]	谢雪峰. 血清和尿RBP、β2-MG与新生儿高胆红素血症严重程度的相关性分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2018, 20(6): 628-631.
[12]	张艳红. 2013~2015年江门市全血献血者脂肪血发生情况分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2018, 20(5): 467-469.
[13]	纪蓉蓉, 张锡敏, 康娜. 无偿献血者血浆颜色异常的初步分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2017, 19(6): 553-555.
[14]	李相会, 孙玲, 孙健, 张娜, 吴红丽. 无乳链球菌检测的影响因素及方法学改进^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2017, 19(6): 609-611.
[15]	陈素珍. 人文关怀对献血护理质量的影响[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2017, 19(5): 521-524.

M蛋白在重氮法与钒酸氧化法检测胆红素中的影响初探

To Learn the Influence of the Detemination of Bilirubin by Means of Diazo and Vanadate Oxidation in the Patient with Paraprotein

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

在线期刊

访问统计

联系我们