• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 97-103.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2022.01.022

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种方案对复发难治性急性髓系白血病患者疗效及预后的影响

杨世礼, 孙晓星, 楚海亮, 王其凯, 李古郡, 葛洪峰   

  1. 236800 亳州,亳州市人民医院血液内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-15 发布日期:2022-01-27
  • 通讯作者: 葛洪峰,男,副主任医师,硕士,主要从事恶性血液病诊治,(E-mail)ghfzz@163.com。
  • 作者简介:杨世礼(1982-),男,安徽亳州人,主治医师,本科,主要从事血液病的诊断与治疗,(E-mail)slyangshili@sina.com。

Effects of two Regimens on Efficacy and Prognosis of Patients with Recurrent Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

YANG Shi-li, SUN Xiao-xing, CHU Hai-liang, et al   

  1. Department of Hematology,Bozhou People's Hospital,Bozhou 236800
  • Received:2021-10-15 Published:2022-01-27

摘要: 目的 研究维奈托克和CAG分别联合阿扎胞苷对复发难治性急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的影响。方法 回顾性分析2019年7月~2020年12月我院65例复发难治性AML患者的临床资料,按照治疗方案不同分为维奈托克组(n=30,维奈托克+阿扎胞苷)、CAG组(n=35,CAG+阿扎胞苷)。比较两组治疗4周后疗效及治疗4、12、24周后预后指标(WT1)、生存质量[卡式功能状态评分量表(KPS)]、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、干扰素γ(IFN-γ)水平和不良反应发生率,比较两组随访结果。结果 治疗4周后,维奈托克组ORR高于CAG组。治疗4、12、24周后,两组WT1表达水平下降,维奈托克组表达水平低于CAG组;两组TNF-α、IFN-γ水平上升,维奈托克组高于CAG组(P<0.05);维奈托克组骨髓抑制Ⅲ~Ⅳ度、恶心呕吐、肝肾功能异常发生率低于CAG组,腹泻、肌肉骨骼疼痛发生率高于CAG组(P<0.05)。治疗24周后维奈托克组KPS高于CAG组(P<0.05)。中位随访时间7个月(1个月~15个月),截至随访终点,维奈托克组总生存(OS)率为53.33%(16/30),CAG组OS率为42.86%(15/35),两组OS率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),维奈托克组无白血病生存(LFS)率高于CAG组(33.33% vs. 11.43%)(P<0.05)。结论 维奈托克+阿扎胞苷对复发难治性AML的疗效优于CAG+阿扎胞苷,可改善机体炎症,预后及生存质量更高,骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、肝肾功能异常发生率较低,但腹泻、肌肉骨骼疼痛发生率较高。

关键词: 维奈托克, 阿扎胞苷, CAG方案, 急性髓系白血病, 预后

Abstract: Objective To study the effects of venetoclax or CAG combined with azacitidine on patients with recurrent refractory acute myeloid leukemia(AML). Methods The clinical data of 65 patients with recurrent refractory AML in the hospital between July 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed,and the patients were divided into venetoclax group (n=30,venetoclax + azacitidine) and CAG group(n=35,CAG + azacitidine) according to different treatment regimens. The efficacy was compared between the two groups after 4 weeks of treatment,prognosis indicator (WT1),quality of life [Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)],levels of tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) and interferon γ(IFN-γ) and incidence rates of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups after 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks of treatment. The follow-up results of the two groups were compared. Results After 4 weeks of treatment,the ORR of venetoclax group was higher than that of CAG group(P<0.05). After 4,12 and 24 weeks of treatment,the WT1 expression level in both groups was decreased,and the expression level of venetoclax group was lower than that of CAG group. The levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ were increased in the two groups, and the levels were higher in venetoclax group than those in CAG group(P<0.05). The incidence rates of Ⅲ~Ⅳ degree bone marrow suppression, nausea and vomiting and abnormal liver-kidney function were lower in venetoclax group than those in CAG group while the incidence rates of diarrhea and musculoskeletal pain were higher than those in CAG group (P<0.05). After 24 weeks of treatment,KPS score in venetoclax group was higher than that in CAG group (P<0.05). The median follow-up time was 7 months (1~15 months). By the end point of follow-up,the overall survival (OS) rate of venetoclax group was 53.33% (16/30)and that of CAG group was 42.86% (15/35),and there was no statistical significance in OS rate between the two groups(P>0.05). The leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate of 33.33% in venetoclax group was significantly higher than 11.43% in CAG group(P<0.05). Conclusion Venetoclax + azacitidine has a better efficacy than CAG + azacitidine in the treatment of recurrent refractory AML,and the former one can improve the body's inflammation and has better prognosis, higher quality of life and lower incidence rates of bone marrow suppression, nausea and vomiting and abnormal liver-kidney function, but has higher incidence rates of diarrhea and musculoskeletal pain.

Key words: Venetoclax, Azacitidine, CAG, regimen, Acute, myeloid, leukemia, Prognosis

中图分类号: