• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 33-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2023.01.006

• 血液安全监测专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

急性输血不良反应发生时间调查及分析*

王胜蓝, 贵明飞, 华敏玉, 李鹏, 卓创近, 刘钟梅, 杨霞, 黄霞, 何涛   

  1. 615000 西昌,凉山彝族自治州中心血站(王胜蓝,刘钟梅,杨霞); 凉山彝族自治州第一人民医院(贵明飞); 无锡市中心血站(华敏玉); 宜昌市中心血站(李鹏); 佛山市中心血站(卓创近); 重庆市血液中心(黄霞,何涛)
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-10 发布日期:2023-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 黄霞,女,主任技师,博士,主要从事血液安全研究,(E-mail)xiahuangyy@163.com。共同通信作者:何涛,男,主任医师,主要从事血站管理和血液安全监测体系建立研究,(E-mail)2698202797@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:王胜蓝(1976-),男,四川大邑人,主任技师,主要从事输血检验研究,(E-mail)11066261@qq.com。并列第一作者:贵明飞(1987-),男,四川西昌人,主管检验师 ,主要从事临床输血研究,(E-mail)315228914@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    *本课题受四川省凉山州技术研究开发与推广应用重点研发项目(No.21ZDYF0134)、重庆市科卫联合医学科研重点项目(No.2022ZDXM031)资助

Occurrence Times of Acute Transfusion Reactions

WANG Sheng-lan, GUI Ming-fei, HUA Min-yu, et al   

  1. Center Blood Stations of Liangshan, Xichang 615000
  • Received:2022-11-10 Published:2023-02-20

摘要: 目的 调查分析输注不同血液成分时不同输血不良反应的发生时间特点。方法 收集来自中国输血协会血液安全监测专业委员会开展血液安全监测的哨点单位报告的急性输血不良反应985例,分析其报告发生率和发生时间的特征。结果 急性输血不良反应中,输注血小板类的输血不良反应报告发生率(6.60‰)远高于输注红细胞类(1.64‰)和血浆类(1.25‰),所有血液成分的过敏反应报告发生率(1.24‰)高于非溶血性发热反应(FNHTR)(0.63‰)和其他反应。输血不良反应的发生时间呈现偏态分布、前高后低的特点,输注红细胞时的输血不良反应发生时间分散分布在前140 min,占79.56%,输注180 min后仍有较多输血不良反应发生;输注血浆时的输血不良反应发生时间集中在前60 min,占56.92%;而输注血小板时的输血不良反应发生时间主要集中在20 min~100 min,占80.33%,在不同时段发生反应的例数波动较大。过敏反应发生比较急骤,输注30 min~60 min其发生数量相对最高;FNHTR发生相对较缓,输注部分血液成分时发生反应的数量有在不同时间段出现高峰的现象。结论 输注不同血液成分的输血不良反应发生率存在差异,发生时间各有其特点。掌握发生时间的规律可以指导临床输血实践,充分保障受血者安全。

关键词: 血液安全监测, 输血不良反应, 时间分析, 发生率, 急性输血不良反应

Abstract: Objective To investigate and analyze the time characteristics of occurrence of blood transfusion adverse reactions during infusion of blood components. Methods A total of 985 cases of acute transfusion reactions (ATRs) reported by sentinel of blood safety monitoring of China Blood Transfusion Association were collected, and incidence rate and time of occurrence were analyzed. Results Among ATRs, the reported incidence of adverse reactions associated with platelet transfusion (6.60‰) was much higher than that associated with red blood cell transfusion (1.64‰) and plasma transfusion (1.25‰). The incidence of allergic reactions from blood components transfused (1.24‰) was higher than that of febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR) (0.63‰) and other reactions. The time of occurrence of transfusion reactions showed right-skewed distribution. The occurrence of adverse reaction of red blood cell transfusion was distributed in the first 140 minutes, accounting for 79.56%, and many adverse reactions still occurred after 180 minutes of transfusion. The adverse reaction of plasma transfusion mainly occurred in the first 60 minutes, accounting for 56.92%. The adverse reaction of platelet transfusion mainly occurred from 20 minutes to 100 minutes, accounting for 80.33%, with the number of cases varied greatly across different time. Allergic reactions occurred rapidly, of which mostly occurred during 30 to 60 minutes after transfusion. FNHTR occurred relatively slowly, and the number of cases of certain blood components transfusion showed peaks at different time periods. Conclusion The incidence of adverse reactions associated with blood component transfusion varied, and the time of occurrence had its own characteristics. Understanding the pattern in occurrence time can guide clinical transfusion practice and fully ensure the safety of blood recipients.

Key words: Haemovigilance, Transfusion reaction, Time analysis, Incidence, Acute transfusion reaction

中图分类号: