• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 778-782.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2023.06.011

• 临床输血 • 上一篇    下一篇

微流控凝胶法与柱凝集法在血型检测中的比较*

望喆, 储玉霜, 肖彦琳, 卞茂红   

  1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院,合肥 230022
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-19 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 卞茂红,主要从事输血的基础和临床应用研究,(E-mail)mhbian@126.com。
  • 作者简介:望喆,主要从事临床输血应用研究,(E-mail)1006915157@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    *本课题受皖江新兴产业技术发展中心产业化项目(No.WJ21CYHXM11)赞助

Comparison of Microfluidic Gel Method and Column Agglutination Technique for Blood Group Typing

WANG Zhe, CHU Yushuang, XIAO Yanlin, et al   

  1. Department of Blood Transfusion, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022
  • Received:2023-10-19 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2024-01-15

摘要: 目的 探索微流控凝胶法在ABO血型正定型及Rh血型抗原检测方面的准确性、灵敏度、特异性。方法 选择1 005例临床用血患者作为研究对象,分别采用微流控凝胶法与柱凝集法进行ABO正定型及Rh血型抗原检测,比较两种方法的阳性符合率、阴性符合率及总符合率,以及在不同疾病与年龄患者中的符合情况;同时运用χ2检验、Kappa检验分析两种方法有无统计学差异。结果 与柱凝集法相比较,微流控凝胶技术在ABO正定型与Rh血型抗原检测中的符合率分别为99.70%、98.61%,鉴定结果不符17例,其中血液系统疾病5例,肿瘤3例,感染科疾病4例,其他5例,其中既往有输血史6例,有孕产史7例;经统计学分析两种方法的检测结果没有显著差异(P>0.05,Kappa值>0.75)。结论 微流控凝胶法具有样本及试剂消耗少、检测卡体积小、操作便捷等优点,在ABO血型正定型及Rh血型抗原检测中的灵敏度高、特异性好、结果准确,有望在临床检测中推广。

关键词: 微流控凝胶法, 柱凝集法, 血型鉴定, ABO, Rh

Abstract: Objective To investigate the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the microfluidic gel method in ABO blood group normalisation and Rh blood group antigen detection. Methods Samples from 1 005 patients with clinical blood use were tested for positive ABO typing and Rh blood grouping by microfluidic gel technology versus column agglutination technology,and the positive, negative and total compliance rates of the two methods were compared, as well as the compliance situation in patients with different diseases and ages. Results Compared with the column agglutination method, the compliance rate of microfluidic gel technology in ABO positive typing and Rh blood typing was 99.70% and 98.61%, respectively. There were 17 cases of incompatible identification results, including 5 cases of haematological diseases, 3 cases of tumours, 4 cases of infectious diseases and 5 cases of other diseases; including 6 cases of history of blood transfusion and 7 cases of history of pregnancy and childbirth; there was no significant difference between the results of the two detection methods with statistical analysis (P>0.05, Kappa value>0.75). Conclusion The microfluidic gel method has the advantages of low sample and reagent consumption, small test card size and convenient operation, and is expected to be popularised in clinical testing due to its high sensitivity, good specificity and accurate results in detecting ABO positive blood group typing and Rh blood group antigen.

Key words: Microfluidic gel technology, Column agglutination technology, Blood typing, ABO, Rh

中图分类号: