• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 202-206.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2018.02.030

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种筛查献血者粒细胞抗癌活性方法的评价

范恩勇, 孙海英, 黄文杰, 郭铭华   

  1. 225007 江苏省扬州市中心血站,扬州市输血研究所
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-28 出版日期:2018-04-20 发布日期:2018-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 孙海英,女,主要从事血液免疫学检验,(Tel)18936220169(E-mail)sunhaiying2010@163.com。
  • 作者简介:范恩勇(1979-),男,山西汾阳人,副主任技师,学士,主要从事输血技术及免疫学检验(Tel)18936220186。

An Evaluation of Two Methods for Screening Antineoplastic Activity of Granulocytes in Donor Cells

FAN En-yong, SUN Hai-ying, HUANG Wen-jie, et al   

  1. Municipal Institute of Blood Transfusion,Yangzhou Red Cross Blood Center,Yangzhou 225012
  • Received:2017-10-28 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-04-25

摘要: 目的 对两种筛查献血者粒细胞抗癌活性的方法进行评价。 方法 选择抗肿瘤综合基因检测和粒细胞体外杀伤试验方法进行“抗癌人”筛查;采集静脉血5 ml,肝素钠抗凝,681例的抗肿瘤综合基因检测由上海邃志生物科技有限公司在72 h内完成;811例的粒细胞体外杀伤试验由国跃生物科技(上海)有限公司在24 h内完成。对189例抗肿瘤综合基因检测的献血者进行粒细胞体外杀伤试验比对分析,对16例(首次基因检测为优秀、良好、中等、偏低各4例)献血者跟踪1月、3月后的基因检测和粒细胞体外杀伤试验情况。 结果 抗肿瘤综合基因检测评分“优秀”献血者占8.4%[(37+20)/681],“良好”献血者占11.0%[(45+30)/681];粒细胞体外杀伤试验“优秀”献血者占19.9%[(141+20)/811],与基因检测“优秀”和“良好”之和19.4%相近,基因得分与粒细胞体外杀伤试验评分大致相符。 结论 基因检测结果稳定,同一个体不同检测时间受外界干扰因素小、结果恒定,可能与基因检测与遗传信息有关,缺点是不能真实反映献血者当前的抗癌活性,筛查成本较高;粒细胞体外杀伤试验结果不稳定,同一个体不同时间的抗癌活性变化较大,可能与献血者心情、身体状况、季节变化等有关,优点是筛查成本较低,易于临床应用和推广。基因检测方法筛查献血者,由于结果为“优秀”的献血者较少,按ABO同型分布就更少,如仅选择评分“优秀”献血者,很难满足临床供应。可以将检测结果为“优秀”或“良好”的献血者按ABO血型同型建立献血者库,然后在采集前对献血者进行粒细胞体外杀伤试验,选择体外杀伤试验结果也为“优秀”的献血者进行单采粒细胞采集。

关键词: 无偿献血者, 单采粒细胞, 高抗癌活性, 细胞杀伤试验, 肿瘤治疗

Abstract: Objective To evaluate antineoplastic activity of granulocytes in blood donors screened by two different methods. Methods The anti-tumor genes were detected in 681 cases within 72 hours. The in vitro cytotoxicity assay of granulocytes and the anti-tumor gene test were carried out within 24 and 72 hours,respectively. 811 cases were detected. The results of immunoprecipitation were compared with those of 189 blood donors who had been tested for anti-tumor gene. The results were compared in 16 patients (excellent,good,moderate and low in 4 cases,respectively). Blood donors were followed for 1 month and 3 months Of the gene detection and granulocyte in vitro killing test. Results The proportion of excellent blood donation was 8.4% and 11.0% was good. The excellent blood donation rate of granulocyte in vitro test was 19.9%,and the score of genetic testing was " Excellent "and" good "and 19.4% similar gene score and granulocyte in vitro killing test score roughly in line. Conclusion The result of genetic testing is stable,and the result is constant,which may be related to genetic information. The disadvantage is that it can not truly reflect the current anti-cancer activity of blood donors,and the cost of screening is high; the results of granulocyte in vitro killing test are unstable; The change of anticancer activity of the individual at different time may be related to the mood,physical condition and seasonal variation of blood donors. The advantage is that the screening cost is low and it is easy to be applied and popularized.

Key words: Donors, Neutropenia, High anticancer activity, Killer cells test, Cancer treatment

中图分类号: