基于循证理念的强化安全护理在重度肾性贫血输血患者中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2020.03.027

临床输血与检验 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 329-333.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2020.03.027

基于循证理念的强化安全护理在重度肾性贫血输血患者中的应用

丁丽, 程丽

230031 合肥,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇一医院检验科

收稿日期:2018-12-13 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-06-13
通讯作者: 程丽,女,主管护师,本科,主要从事检验科护理方面研究,（E-mail）27536796@qq.com。
作者简介:丁丽（1984-）,女,安徽合肥人,主管护师,本科,主要从事检验科护理方面研究,（E-mail）27536796@qq.com。

Application of Enhanced Safety Nursing Based on Evidence-based Concept in Patients with Severe Renal Anemia during Transfusion

DING Li, CHENG Li

Department of Clinical Laboratory, the 901th Hospital of the PLA Joint Service, Hefei 230031

Received:2018-12-13 Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-06-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨在重度肾性贫血输血患者中基于循证理念的强化安全护理的应用效果及价值。方法分别对实施常规护理的62例、实施基于循证理念的强化安全护理的70例重度肾性贫血输血患者的临床资料进行回顾,记为常规护理组、强化护理组。对比2组护理效果和护理满意度。结果护理后两组BAI和BDI评分均下降（P<0.05）,强化护理组均低于常规护理组（P<0.05）;强化护理组护理后关于申请单内容、申请流程、常用血液制品、与输液的区别、适应证、效果评估、不良反应、不良反应应急措施、相关法律知识健康认知正确率均高于常规护理组（P<0.05）;护理期间强化护理组溶血反应、瘘管堵塞和院内感染的发生率均低于常规护理组（P<0.05）;强化护理组护理满意度分级与常规护理组差异显著（P<0.05）,总满意率高于后者（P<0.05）。结论在重度肾性贫血输血患者中实施基于循证理念的强化安全护理不仅能够保障其输血安全,还可减轻负性情绪,改善健康认知,提升护理满意度。

关键词: 循证理念, 强化安全护理, 重度肾性贫血, 输血

Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect and value of enhanced safety nursing based on evidence-based concept in patients with severe renal anemia during transfusion. Methods The clinical data of 62 patients with severe renal anemia who received routine nursing and 70 patients who received intensive safety nursing based on evidence-based concept were retrospectively analyzed and recorded as routine nursing group, intensive nursing group. The nursing effect and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results After nursing, the scores of BAI and BDI in both groups decreased （P<0.05）, while those in intensive nursing group were lower than those in routine nursing group （P<0.05）. After intensive nursing, the correct rates of health cognition about the content of application form, application process, common blood products, the difference between infusion and infusion, indication, effect evaluation, adverse reactions, emergency measures for adverse reactions and relevant legal knowledge in intensive nursing group were higher than those in routine nursing group （P<0.05）. The incidences of hemolysis, fistula blockage and nosocomial infection in intensive nursing group were lower than those in routine nursing group （P< 0.05）. There was a significant difference in nursing satisfaction grade between intensive nursing group and routine nursing group （P<0.05）, and the total satisfaction rate was higher than that of the latter （P<0.05）. Conclusion Enhanced safety nursing based on evidence-based concept in patients with severe renal anemia transfusion can not only ensure the safety of blood transfusion, improve health awareness and improve nursing satisfaction, but also reduce negative emotions.

Key words: Evidence-based concept, Enhanced safety nursing, Severe renal anemia, Blood transfusion

中图分类号:

R473.5

丁丽, 程丽. 基于循证理念的强化安全护理在重度肾性贫血输血患者中的应用[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2020, 22(3): 329-333.

DING Li, CHENG Li. Application of Enhanced Safety Nursing Based on Evidence-based Concept in Patients with Severe Renal Anemia during Transfusion[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL TRANSFUSION AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 22(3): 329-333.

参考文献

[1] 王凯,赵显国,李素珍,等.河南省维持性血液透析患者心血管并发症调查分析[J].中国血液净化,2008,7(7):361-362.
[2] 宁尚勇,常乃柏,韩晓燕,等.北京城区社区居住老年人贫血现状及病因学分析[J].中华内科杂志,2016,55(4):289-292.
[3] 徐茂茂,汪秀英.肾性贫血患者血液红细胞及网织红细胞参数临床检验探析[J]. 临床输血与检验,2017,19(5):451-454.
[4] 夏翠英,余小平.输血指征评分对大量输血患者的安全性和有效性研究[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(4):554-556.
[5] 罗群,陈丕平.NKF-DOQI肾性贫血治疗指南[J].现代实用医学,2001,13(3):117.
[6] 丁蔚,周群,赵丹,等.应用问题追踪法加强输血安全管理的实践[J]. 中华医院管理杂志,2016,32(11):843-845.
[7] 杨雄,任世福.维持性血液透析患者抑郁患病情况及相关因素分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2013,24(13):2881-2882.
[8] 张艾佳,陆群,钱蓓蓓,等.常见输血不良反应发生率及相关危险因素探讨[J]. 中国输血杂志,2017,30(10):1165-1167.
[9] 郑健荣,黄炽荣,黄洁晶,等.贝克焦虑量表的心理测量学特性、常模分数及因子结构的研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(1):4-6.
[10] 杨文辉,刘绍亮,周烃,等.贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在青少年中的信效度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(2):240-245.
[11] 达万明,裴雪涛.现代血液病学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003:185-186.
[12] 常立阳,冯志仙,邵荣雅,等.住院患者护理满意度测评量表的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(5):454-456.
[13] Lee S W,Kim Y H,Chung W,et al.Serum hepcidin and iron indices affect Anemia status differently according to the kidney function of non-Dialysis chronic kidney disease patients:Korean cohort study for outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease (KNOW-CKD)[J]. Kidney Blood Press Res,2017,42(6):1183-1192.
[14] Bukmir L,Fiši M,Dimini-Lisica I,et al.Anemia in chronic kidney disease[J]. Acta Med Croatica,2016,70(4/5):217-224.
[15] 单涛,景慎旗,单红伟,等.基于FMEA优化护理输血闭环管理的研究与应用[J].中国数字医学,2017,12(2):9-11.
[16] 姚家莲,杨景明,陈仕飞.临床路径在慢性肾脏病肾性贫血中的应用[J]. 护士进修杂志,2013,28(3):280-281.
[17] Tanaka K,Kitagawa M,Onishi A,et al.Arterial stiffness is an independent risk factor for Anemia after percutaneous native kidney biopsy[J]. Kidney Blood Press Res,2017,42(2):284-293.
[18] 张玉环,菅志远. 健康教育在晚期肾病病人贫血治疗中的作用[J]. 护理研究,2007,21(17):1545-1546.
[19] 黄悦兰. 全程跟踪考核法在输血护理质量管理中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2016,22(20):95-96.

基于循证理念的强化安全护理在重度肾性贫血输血患者中的应用

Application of Enhanced Safety Nursing Based on Evidence-based Concept in Patients with Severe Renal Anemia during Transfusion

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

在线期刊

访问统计

联系我们

[1]	段秉政, 王淑莲, 连俊慧, 陶琳, 高玉云. 直接抗人球蛋白试验在患者输血疗效中的临床意义分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 189-191.
[2]	杨春晨, 戎瑞明, 李杨, 蒋密, 周蓉. 基于Cov-AHP-模糊综合评价法构建输血病历质量评价模型[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 192-196.
[3]	张保萍, 张嵘, 王文婷, 安群星, 尹文, 胡兴斌. 谱细胞鉴定剂量效应分析偏差致抗-C抗体漏检1例[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 236-239.
[4]	骆群, 王雨婧, 卓海龙. 2020年免疫血液学研究进展^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 248-255.
[5]	汪晓晓, 郭建荣. 自体输血在老年患者手术中的应用价值及风险分析^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(2): 259-262.
[6]	北京医学会输血医学分会, 北京医师协会输血专业专家委员会. 中国输血医师规范化培训实施方案专家共识[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 1-5.
[7]	樊凤艳, 汪德清. 我国临床输血发展的挑战与思考[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 10-12.
[8]	贺敏威, 孙苏静, 周欠欠, 王小慧, 詹林盛. 2020年度输血医学科研新进展[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 13-17.
[9]	吴建君, 史荣辉, 赵树铭. 临床输血医师工作内容探讨[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 17-19.
[10]	王文婷, 党盼玉, 张保萍, 胡兴斌, 安群星, 尹文. 抗-D抗体致新生儿溶血病的输血策略及其预后疗效评估分析[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 38-40.
[11]	钟明璐, 黄慧瑛, 张旸, 王立, 汪传喜, 魏亚明. 储存式自体输血在脊柱外科手术中应用的疗效及安全性研究^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 68-71.
[12]	李丽玮, 钟宁, 李兴龙, 杨燕, 于建, 李志强. 基于信息化系统输血样本配送管理模式建立与应用研究[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 79-82.
[13]	朱琳琳, 赵庆伟, 张晨光. 基于研究性学习的CBL教学在临床输血检验教学中的应用探索^*[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 104-106.
[14]	王娟, 王文婷, 胡兴斌, 尹文. 血浆置换成功治疗难治性莫旺综合征合并膜性肾病1例[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 109-111.
[15]	朱彦虹, 胡晓琳, 陈玲. 新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎与输血相关性研究附3例报告[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2021, 23(1): 111-116.