• 中国科学论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国化学文摘(CA)来源期刊
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

临床输血与检验 ›› 2023, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 388-395.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2023.03.018

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

全血献血人群和单采献血人群延迟献血因素的对比分析研究

赵冬雁, 沈有华, 田志彬, 项征国, 李涛, 张微, 张国权, 李玲, 徐今晶, 薛双林, 张丹, 王晓颖, 袁晓华, 侯玲华, 马立仙, 段志倩, 李丽, 贾红志, 赵兰青, 王振兴, 范丽莉, 张珩, 张秀琪, 程念念, 赵超, 邱艳   

  1. 100088 北京,北京市红十字血液中心(赵冬雁,邱艳); 上饶市中心血站(沈有华); 濮阳市中心血站(田志彬); 武汉血液中心(项征国); 长沙血液中心(李涛); 北京市通州区中心血站(张微); 陕西省血液中心(张国权); 江苏省血液中心(李玲); 天津市血液中心(徐今晶); 甘肃省红十字血液中心(薛双林); 重庆市血液中心(张丹); 辽宁省血液中心(王晓颖); 乌鲁木齐市血液中心(袁晓华); 河北省血液中心(侯玲华); 宁夏回族自治区血液中心(马立仙); 南京红十字血液中心(段志倩); 淮安市中心血站(李丽); 盐城市中心血站(贾红志); 赤峰市中心血站(赵兰青); 东莞市中心血站(王振兴); 青岛市中心血站(范丽莉); 云南昆明血液中心(张珩); 秦皇岛市中心血站(张秀琪); 焦作市中心血站(程念念); 保定市中心血站(赵超)
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-23 发布日期:2023-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 邱艳,主任技师,研究员,主要从事安全输血相关研究,(E-mail) 13681201834@163.com。
  • 作者简介:赵冬雁,主要从事血液安全和献血者招募方面研究,(E-mail) 13810720786@126.com。

Comparative Analysis of Causes of Deferred Blood Donation between Whole Blood and Aphaeresis Donors

ZHAO Dongyan, SHEN Youhua, TIAN Zhibin, et al   

  1. Beijing Red Cross Blood Center, Beijing 100088
  • Received:2023-05-23 Published:2023-07-10

摘要: 目的 对2019—2021年我国部分采供血机构全血献血人群和单采献血人群延迟献血因素进行对比分析研究。方法 采用回顾性分析方法,收集2019—2021年我国部分采供血机构延迟献血相关数据。采供血机构根据省级(血液中心)和地市级(中心血站)不同分为甲乙2组,献血人群分为全血献血人群、单采献血人群,主要研究饮酒、服用药物、月经生理期、既往病史、体重不达标、体温异常、脉搏异常、血压异常、乳糜血、血红蛋白(Hb)异常、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)升高、乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)阳性、丙型肝炎抗体(抗-HCV)阳性、梅毒血清特异性抗体(抗-TP)阳性、艾滋病毒抗体(抗-HIV)阳性、其他等16个延迟献血原因。根据分组、献血人群和延迟献血原因排序不同,分别收集延迟献血率和延迟献血原因排在第1、第2、第3位的相关数据进行比较分析。结果 全血献血人群延迟献血率(中位数8.57%)低于单采献血人群延迟献血率(中位数10.79%);甲组不同年度不同献血人群的延迟献血率中位数均高于乙组,两者存在显著差异。所报告的排在前3位的延迟献血原因数据中,全血献血人群涉及11个,较单采献血人群多了饮酒、服用药物、脉搏异常3个原因;ALT升高、乳糜血、Hb异常3个原因在全血献血人群累计被报告194(74.33%)次,在单采献血人群累计被报告187(71.65%)次,是最主要的延迟献血原因。结论 我国部分采供血机构全血献血人群和单采献血人群延迟献血因素方面存在差异。

关键词: 延迟献血, 血液安全, 献血者筛查, 献血者选择

Abstract: Objective The factors of deferred blood donation between whole blood donors and aphaeresis donors in some blood collection and supply institutions from 2019 to 2021 were compared and analyzed. Methods A retrospective analysis method was used to collect data related to deferred donors in some blood collection and supply institutions from 2019 to 2021, which were divided into A and B groups according to provincial (blood centers) and prefecture-level (central blood stations). Blood donors were divided into whole blood donors and aphaeresis donors. The main studies were alcohol consumption, drug use, menstrual period, past medical history, underweight, abnormal body temperature, abnormal pulse, abnormal blood pressure, chylous blood, abnormal hemoglobin (Hb), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive, hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) positive, syphilis serum specific antibody (anti -TP) positive, HIV antibody (anti-HIV) positive, and other 16 reasons for deferred blood donation. According to different groups, blood donors and the ranking of deferred blood donation reasons, relevant data of deferred blood donation rate and deferred blood donation reasons ranked first, second and third were collected respectively for comparative analysis. Results The deferred blood donation rate of whole blood donors (median 8.57%) was lower than that of aphaeresis donors (median 10.79%). The median deferred blood donation rate of different blood donors in different years in group A was higher than that in group B, and there were significant differences between them. Among the top 3 reasons for deferred blood donation reported, whole blood donors involved 11 reasons, more than the aphaeresis donors drinking alcohol, taking drugs, abnormal pulse 3 reasons; ALT elevation, chylous blood and Hb abnormality have been reported for a total of 194 (74.33%) times in whole blood donors and 187 (71.65%) times in aphaeresis donors, which are the most important reasons for deferred blood donation. Conclusion There are differences in deferred blood donation factors between whole blood donors and aphaeresis donors in some blood collection and supply institutions.

Key words: Blood donation deferral, Blood safety, Donor screening, Donor selection

中图分类号: